Friday Fatales – Woman of Mystery P. D. James

On Fridays the Women of Mystery honor an author recognized for her contribution to the mystery genre, and take a look at one of her novels.

After nearly six decades writing crime novels, best-selling British author P. D. James is much loved and going strong at 91. Her latest novel, Death Comes to Pemberley, was published 
less than a year ago. It’s a sequel, believe it or not, to her beloved Jane Austin’s Pride and Prejudice. James has gone and done in one of Austin’s characters, and plays the whole cast in this dark riff.

She’s credited with transforming the traditional English detective novel. She was, and is, primarily drawn to plot, but unlike many of her predecessors of the Golden Age, she doesn’t use one-dimensional villains, sacrificing their humanity for the sake of the puzzle. Her villains are ordinary people, flawed and pressured beyond what they are capable of coping with, but not evil. In fact it is sometimes her victims who are most despicable, and their murders feel in some way like justice.

In Adam Dalgliesh books, which have won her fans all over the world, James intentionally drew a character she could live with for decades. She claims she planned it that way to avoid falling out of love with her detective, which is the problem that Agatha Christie ran into with Hercules Poirot. She says that Dalgliesh is a male version of her.  Despite the adversity they’ve suffered, despite their shared sensitivity and literary bent (Dalgliesh is a poet) she says they are both without sentiment.

She’s a master at developing atmosphere, but her description of place does more than one job.  She uses it to give us an understanding of a character’s emotional state and personality.

From A Taste for Death:

“It was eight forty-five and they were nearing the church, passing now into one of the low tunnels that spanned the canal. Darren, who liked best this part of the walk, gave a whoop and rushed into the tunnel, hollering for an echo and running his hands, like pale starfish, along the brick walls. She followed his leaping figure, half-dreading the moment when she would pass through the arch into that claustrophobic, dank, river-smelling darkness and would hear, unnaturally loud, the suck of the canal against the paving stones and the slow drip of water from the low roof. She quickened her pace, and within minutes the half moon of brightness at the end of the tunnel had widened to receive them again into the daylight and he was back, shivering at her side.”

A Taste for Death introduces the young inspector Kate Miskin, as strong as Dalgliesh and in some ways more interesting:

“The elation went deeper than mere ambition or the satisfaction of a test passed, a job well done. She had enjoyed herself. Every minute of her brief confrontation with that self-satisfied poseur had been deeply pleasurable. She thought of her first months with the CID, the plugging, conscientious, door-to-door enquiries which had made up her day, the pathetic victims, the even more pathetic villains. How much more satisfying was this sophisticated manhunt.”

The subject of P. D. James is huge and fascinating.  Any favorite stories about her? Any favorites among her novels?

Friday Fatales – Woman of Mystery Agatha Christie

On Fridays the Women of Mystery honor an author recognized for her contribution to the mystery genre, and take a look at one of her novels.

I hardly need to introduce you to Agatha Christie, British Golden Age who-done-it writer best known for two eccentric and diametrically opposed detectives: self-aggrandizing and methodical Hercules Poirot, and self-effacing Miss Jane Marple, student of human nature.

It’s possible you didn’t know that, according to PBS’ Miss Marple website, she was outsold only by the Bible and Shakespeare, that in fifty years she wrote more than a hundred literary works, including six romances under the pseudonym Mary Westmacott. That Christie, with Sayers (whom we honored last week), was one of thirteen contributors, members of London’s exclusive Detection Club, who playfully co-authored the world’s best known round-robin mystery, The Floating Admiral.

It was especially fascinating to read, at The Christie Mystery, about her writing methods. It was no surprise that her characters came from observations of strangers on trains. As for plots, it was delicious to learn that she sometimes stumbled on an elegant way to disguise a character’s guilt while, for example, gazing at a hat in a shop, and that she usually did so (stumble, that is) before sitting down at her typewriter. Her books evolved not only in the five or six notebooks she had going at once, but grew like embryos inside her very soul, and once they reached full gestation she sometimes wrote them incredibly fast. But she was just as likely to write two at a time to keep them from going stale.

Her writing style has been analyzed by academics who have gone so far as to figure out the average number of letters in her words and the number of words in her sentences: remarkably uniform, apparently, although the site does not reveal the magic figures.

She seems, almost, to have set out to mesmerize readers. According to researchers, people can’t focus on more than nine things at a time, and Christie often used more than nine characters and sub plots. Her language was simple, and she repeated words rapid fire for emphasis, to penetrate (something akin to brainwashing?). With frequent descriptive segments near the beginning and few toward the end, she controlled the speed at which we read her books. It’s no wonder we lose ourselves in them.

And Then There Were None is a much-admired stand-alone mystery.  Christie published it in 1939, calling it “Ten Little Niggers,” but it first arrived on America’s shores with the less offensive title “Ten Little Indians.

Although we’re clued in to the number and manner of murders by the children’s nursery rhyme, which starts the count-down at ten and ends with “and then there were none,” I defy you to figure out who done the deed. There’s no detective, unless you count the bewildered Scotland Yard inspectors in whose laps the puzzle falls when the story’s all told. I was relieved, after all, to find Christie’s traditional tie-it-all-together-with-a-bow ending. It comes in the form of a sort-of letter. It blew me away. By the way, if you want to enjoy the book, I do not recommend reading Wikipedia’s page about it, where major spoilers lurk.

Here is a little something to leave you wanting more:

“In a non-smoking carriage Miss Emily Brent sat very upright as was her custom. She was sixty-five and she did not approve of lounging. Her father, a Colonel of the old school, had been particular about deportment.

The present generation was shamelessly lax – in their carriage, and in every other way….

Enveloped in an aura of righteousness and unyielding principles, Miss Brent sat in her crowded third-class carriage and triumphed over its discomfort and its heat. Everyone made such a fuss over things nowadays! They wanted injections before they had teeth pulled – they took drugs if they couldn’t sleep – they wanted easy chairs and cushions and the girls allowed their figures to slop about anyhow and lay about half naked on the beaches in summer.

Miss Brent’s lips set closely. She would like to make an example of certain people.”

Tra la! Do tell me your favorite Christie works, and I’d really like to hear about the romances, if you’ve read one.

Friday Fatales – Woman of Mystery Dorothy Sayers

On Fridays the Women of Mystery honor an author recogized for her contribution to the mystery genre, and take a look at one of her novels.

Dorothy L. Sayers (1893-1957)

Dorothy Sayers was a master among British authors in the so-called Golden Age of detective fiction that flourished in the 1920’s and 30’s. She’s recognized and loved not only for her skill as a writer, but for her choice of unorthodox murder weapons: poisoned cat claws, dental fillings, and slingshots, to name a few.

For the most part Sayers adopted the strictures of the cozy whodunit. But she trended away from the crumbling manor house and sweet country village. Instead she placed flawed and complex characters – notably Lord Peter Wimsey and Harriet Vane – in the worlds of commerce and academia.

Like Agatha Christie’s, her books featured eccentrics, and she appears to have been one herself. Peter Lovesey in an address to the Detection Club that Sayers founded, tells how she both terrified lesser mortals and entertained her friends. He quotes John Dickson Carr: “Dorothy Sayers, after making some inroads on a bottle of scotch, arose like one addressing a Sunday School and recited the limerick about the young girl from Madras.”

Murder Must Advertise, a Lord Peter Wimsey Mystery (Book Ten)

It’s hard to write an entirely serious discussion about Murder Must Advertise, published in 1933. Not only is the novel full of amusing banter à la P. G. Wodehouse, but it’s hard to ignore the startling similarities between the novel’s ad firm, Pym’s Publicity, and Mad Men‘s Sterling Cooper Advertising Agency.  Across three decades – and the Atlantic Ocean – we’ve got the same secretarial pool, unceasing consumption of alcohol and cigarettes, the lone female copywriter, the clash of societal segments, impersonations . . . you name it. (Sayers herself worked as a copywriter in an advertising agency, which helps to explain why the book’s setting rings so wonderfully true.)

I suppose I should say that the book is satirical, points the finger at consumerism, and examines the world of work and class differences. It does all that, yes, but it doesn’t weigh us down. It is dialogue that draws a picture of the office and of each character. With sustained banter in the first third of the novel, Sayers keeps us out of Mr. Bredon’s head. If she hadn’t, we’d know right off he’s A VERY IMPORTANT CHARACTER impersonating a lowly writer. We’re not supposed to guess.

Here’s a taste:

“Does this kind of thing happen often?” inquired Mr. Bredon.

“Not with such catastrophic results,” replied Mr. Ingleby, “but that staircase is definitely a death-trap.”

“I fell down it myself one day,” said Miss Rossiter, “and tore the heels off both my shoes. It was awfully awkward, because I hadn’t another pair in the place and—“

“I’ve drawn a horse, darlings!” announced Miss Meteyard, arriving without ceremony. “No luck for you, Mr. Bredon, I’m afraid.”

“I always was unlucky.”

“You’ll feel unluckier still after a day with Dairyfields Margarine,” said Mr. Ingleby, gloomily. “Nothing for me, I suppose?”

“Nothing, I’m afraid. Of course Miss Rawlings had drawn the favourite—she always does.”

“I hope it breaks its beastly leg,” said Mr. Ingleby. “Come in Tallboy, come in. Do you want me? Don’t mind butting in on Mr. Bredon. He will soon become used to the idea that his room is a public place within the meaning of the act. This is Mr. Tallboy, group-manager for Nutrax and a few other wearisome commodities. Mr. Bredon, our new copy-writer.”

Do you have a favorite among Dorothy Sayers’ novels? I’d appreciate recommendations, because it took reading the book to totally endear me to characters I’d been introduced to in PBS productions.

Books Amaze Me

Borge's fingerprint labyrinth at the aMAZEme project

The aMAZEme labyrinth made of 250,000 books.

If you’re traveling to the UK in the next week or two, stop off at the London Festival to see the aMAZEMe art project that certainly puts my own book collection to shame. The work is an interactive labyrinth made of books. It’s performance art and cinema and astonishing.

Marcos Saboya and Gualter Pupo, Brazilian artists, conceived of the enormous maze, stacking 250,000 books like stones to create walls up to 2.5 meters high. The maze, patterned after the real fingerprint whorls of Argentinian writer Jorge Luis Borges, hits a chord for book lovers and mystery fans.

Okay, so Borges was pretty much a highbrow modernist literary figure, but he actually wrote a detective series collaboratively, under the pseudonym  H. Bustos Domecq. The stories – in particular a collection called Six Problems for Don Isidro Parodi – were

Six Problems of Don Isidro

Jorge Luis Borges collaborating as H. Bustos Domecq in a detective series about Don Isidro Parodi.

spoofs that used a “Phone-In Detective” device, sort of like Nero Wolfe who rarely left his brownstone, or even Monk, who once solved a hit and run by reading a newspaper report about it. In Six Problems, from behind the bars of a cell where he has been unjustly imprisoned, the detective Don Isidro Parodi brilliantly solves mysteries that his visitors report.

So go watch Borges’ fingerprint rise in the 5,382 square foot aMAZEme project, and check out a video of the mobs that helped build it.

Tap the Chilling Techno Future for Your Next Thriller?

It’s not that I want to scare or depress you, but I happened on this TED video – A vision of crimes in the future – as an innocent writer of mystery and suspense. If you can stand to research it for your next novel, you might want to throw in some misleading details! Then again, maybe not.

Here’s the blurb:

“The world is becoming increasingly open, and that has implications both bright and dangerous. Marc Goodman paints a portrait of a grave future, in which technology’s rapid development could allow crime to take a turn for the worse.

Marc Goodman works to prevent future crimes and acts of terrorism, even those security threats not yet invented.”

Goodman believes that all of us working together are more likely to devise ways to protect citizens than are the security branches of our government.  If so, a best seller might be just the thing to bring it to the public. I’m not so sure . . . I’ve always wondered whether those who write thrillers weren’t giving away deadly secrets. Any thoughts?

I’m hoping the video is over the top, but the guy has plenty of credentials. Marc Goodman: A Vision of Crimes in the Future

Meeting Readers: The Real High of Getting Published

Last winter, I saw a dear friend, whom I hadn’t seen in ages, at a party. It was just after the launch of Murder New York Style: Fresh Slices, and my friend had immediately bought and read the anthology. She introduced me on the spot to some friends in her book group, who suggested they make it their April book of the month if I’d come and answer author-type questions.

Marilyn Monroe readingIn response, I offered a panel: three from Warwick with stories in the book. I wasn’t sure Anita Page and Fran Cox would want to make the long drive with me to the Poconos in PA, but these lovely book group folks were enthusiastic. What’s more, they decided to combine two local book groups, and to do a potluck dinner for which we needn’t contribute a dish! (It’s as if they had prior knowledge of my culinary skills . . .) So on the day of the scheduled event, the three of us trundled off shouting, “Road trip!”

It was a wonderful evening, not least – in my case – because I’d barely taken my seat with fork in hand when one of them exclaimed, “To think I’m eating dinner with the author of The Understudy!” And yeah, I did need to confirm she was only half joshing.

We settled down in the living room, twenty strong. They had bought and read Fresh Slices, and had clearly enjoyed it. They asked everything: from how we came to write the stories, what inspired our characters, and did they feel alive? (They thought so.) What our connections were to the New York neighborhoods we wrote about, then on to the composition of short stories and the publishing experience, and why we wrote such dark stuff. Did we have personal knowledge of murder? Violence in our pasts? (This wasn’t the first time we’d been asked that particular question.) Who were the New York Sisters in Crime? How was writing short fiction different from writing a novel?

The experience was so much better than peddling the work. These women had not only read the book, but were eager to meet some of the authors. Some of them were writers themselves. They were fun and smart and genuine.

One day I’m sure (ahem) this kind of thing will no longer be a novelty. Until then, we count ourselves lucky to have had the chance to talk about our stories face to face with readers, and to realize the reception they’ve had beyond friends and family.

It wasn’t just the three of us who should enjoy this moment. Every one of the anthology’s fabulous authors should feel the tingle.

Burning Question

The burning question for me regarding the Justice Department’s recent price-fixing suit is how five publishers and Apple could be charged in an antitrust action, while Amazon is left untouched. That’s like giving a few pedestrians tickets for jay walking while King Kong climbs the Empire State Building, threatening to take the city down. Of course, Amazon didn’t hold any secret meetings to set prices because when you hold the all cards there’s no one you need to meet with.

The point of an antitrust suit is to protect consumers. I would like someone in Justice to explain how putting even more control in Amazon’s hands accomplishes that.

Take a look at David Carr’s piece in yesterday’s New York Times and then let us hear your thoughts on this.

Hope for Indie Bookstores?

I’m hearing stirrings and rumblings, far and wide, about ways to fight the constant death blows to indie bookstores.

There’s been a revival in community supported projects on several fronts, like green markets and CSA’s. And now, at Parnassus Books in big city Nashville and Buffalo Street Books in Ithaca, NY, people by the hundreds are buying shares to open – or keep alive – indie bookstores. I bumped into the notion on Utne Reader, which has a great video of a Colbert Report spot on indie bookstores, from an interview with Ann Patchett who started Parnassus. Read the NY Times article about what she’s doing here.

Then there’s the emergence of NYC storefront retailers, a few of them bookstores, as described in a Metrofocus Op-Ed, Occupy Manhattan Storefronts. It appears that chain stores of all kinds are losing ground, and small shops are gaining by connecting with their neighborhoods.  Booklovers Fight for Stores Uptown remarks, “Neighborhood bookstores offer a smaller selection of books targeted for a local audience. ‘You don’t get a Washington Heights section from Borders,’ said Veronica Liu, Word Up’s founder.” 

I think community interest in neighborhood indies is more than rebellion against (now defunct) Borders and (struggling?) Barnes and Noble, quelled by bloodthirsty Amazon. It’s also dismay, after removing the blinders, about what we’ve lost. A bit of guilt about our own passive complicity. And a few smart people who are taking it upon themselves to do something about the mess.

The other day I was eating breakfast with my writing group at a local village restaurant, and noticed a change in a storefront window across the street. Oh yeah, said my friend Judy. There’s a new bookstore coming to town.
She’s the mayor’s wife, so she ought to know. The occasion clearly called for strapping on my tap shoes, but in deference to fellow diners I let out a ladylike whoop. We turned to stare in open-mouthed wonder, then one by one we turned back to our pancakes and shared remembrances of the bookstores that failed to thrive in our charming downtown.

This time will be different. If our glorious new shop starts to go under, I’ll be pulling people in off the streets to sign up for shares.