Friday, March 7, 2008

Don't Care What. Who Do You Write For?

From the amazing Branded in the 80s blog, the Dungeons & Dragons cartoon. I hope blogger Shawn will be my peep.


Elaine posted this week about the ever-shifting definitions within genres. As I see it, shelving arrangements are as much fashion as fact, and I know writers who have to check 2 or 3 sections to find themselves. But the purpose of knowing your market as a writer is to help you explain it to agents and editors and readers, to help you hit the bullseye of your story goal better. And I find keeping up with the slapdash scorecards of Hot and Not subgenres only make me confused and dispirited.

When I use the term story goal, I don't mean anything tremendously formal, just the way you'd like readers to feel at the end. Should they love/hate the protagonist, be pleasantly spent from the thrill ride or the laughs, feel like they've just left a bowling alley full of entertaining regulars, have a brooding sense of tragic reality or of difficult justice done? I think once you're far enough in a manuscript, you ought to know what overall effect you hope to achieve, so your editing passes can refine and amplify it. But who is it you're trying to affect?

The category I'm finding most persistently useful as a career-oriented fiction writer is target readership. Who are my people and who else do they read? If I capture that, the publishing types can encode it into whatever slot for the catalog, because by the time I start calling myself "fill-in-the-blank-lit" in a query, that label may be so February. Laura recently posted about finding unusual new ways to reach potential readers. Knowing who readers are means you can better locate them outside the bookstore and library, and better understand how certain agents or publishing approaches may help you reach them. Addressing the crucial question of readership, however, means addressing one of the most common and infuriating assumptions I hear again and again from other aspirants.

Aspiring Writer's Conceit #1: I am writing for all ages, both and mixed genders, all strata of society and anarchy, a tale that translated into every language on the planet can bring enjoyment and enrichment to any intelligent, sentient being of any species currently known or unknown.

Oh sure, we can't assemble five people to agree on the proper preparation and condiments for a hot dog, but I'll say Amen to your lofty claim if you'll do the same for me. Okay, now may we at least admit that establishing our inevitable, global readership requires a beachhead? First, the readers of Ed McBain's police procedurals, for example, then the world.

For my latest project, I've confessed my peeps (with visual evidence) in this post. When I'm standing near people in a line or on the subway, the clothes they're wearing and the media or products they're carrying or discussing tell me whether they're my potential readers. Some of these folks (sadly) enjoy less of the printed prose for leisure than other media. No matter, I still think they're awesome, so I have a comic book and will have a web comic as a portal to my created world. I hope it may lead some of the more prose-phobic to try out a novel of mine someday as well as adding facets and bonus content for those finding the book first. My target readers are probably 18-54, significantly male though I'm not (tricky), and geeks of some niche who like modern technology, games, mysterious histories, and having their brains tickled. They enjoy the absurd and fantastic as a way to play with real-world dilemmas and existential concepts. Robots versus ancient ghosts in an Apocalypse with banana peels.

So, are your peeps buying recyclables or scrapbooking, volunteering at animal shelters or attending concerts, watching Judge Judy or reading biographies in the bathtub? Are they of a certain age or gender? Do they read 2 hardcovers a month or 4 paperbacks a week? Who are their current favorite authors? I'm going on a limb as an unproven quantity here, and welcome any feedback from authors farther down their professional paths. I've spent a lot of time imagining my protagonists and plot, but I believe it's also important to spend time imagining what their consumers might be like. Who are they and what do they value in their reading experience? Then, it'll be more obvious to the many people a writer like me must convince between invention and publication how my final manuscript will delight that readership as well as myself.

3 comments:

Elaine Will Sparber said...

Kudos, Clare! Looking at your job as an author--and a job is what it is--in a logical, business-minded way is a step that many writers cannot or just plain refuse to take. As an editor, I've dealt with so many of the head-in-the-cloud authors you describe, it's disturbing. To me, the mark of an amateur is not a lack of publishing history, but the belief that you don't need to be aware of or concerned with anything but the words you put in your manuscript. A world in which we could just pour our hearts out on paper and end up with a lucrative publishing contract, a best-seller, and awards for excellence would be ideal. But it's not the reality. Once writers learn this, their chances of success increase dramatically. And their creativity doesn't need to suffer; it just needs to be directed a little more.

Let me quickly add, though, that it's not wrong to just think about your writing and ignore target audiences, marketing designations, etc. Many people write purely for pleasure, with no thought or desire at all to be published. These are not the people I'm talking about.

Clare2e said...

Thanks, Elaine.
Seasoned editorial opinions are exactly the kind of feedback I wanted to hear and take to heart.

I mark the differentiation between writing for pure joy and potential profit, too, so I called myself a "career-oriented fiction writer". Art for Art's sake still rocks, and causes wonderful things to be made, but we're talking the grubbier business of enterprise here.

Laura (Kramarsky) Curtis said...

I think of this often. It's why, for example, I am so hesitant to go with a small press for my cozy. For that particular book (not all cozies, but that one), a huge part of my audience either just flat cannot afford a trade paperback or wouldn't spend the money for one.

In that, I am talking not about the standard mystery readership, the people who devour mysteries and books in general, but the people who usually *don't* buy books, or at least not very many. They're the thousands of people who come to bead shows every year, hang out on jewelry and crafting forums, spend their spare cash on beads and wire, not on books. I am convinced that I can tempt these people to spend $7 for a mass market paperback, but it's asking a lot to ask them to spend $17 for trade paper.

I am in touch with my target audience for the cozy in my day job, so I know their concerns. I don't have nearly so close a relationship with my target audience for the romantic suspense. I know what they read, I'm just not so sure who they are, if that makes any sense.

But as Elaine said, I consider it part of my job to find out.