This past week, the NY Times had an article called Thumbs Race as Japan’s Best Sellers Go Cellular about the new breed of "cell phone novelists." [Picture from Times article, with caption: Rin, 21, tapped out a novel on her cellphone that sold 400,000 copies in hardcover.]
Now, as I've stated many times, I can't even read for long periods on my computer, with its lovely bright screen, let alone attempting to read on my cell phone. And the last time I tried to send a text message, it took me something like 15 minutes to write "I'll be ready at six." But I totally "get" that I am old, and not like the people writing and reading cell phone novels.
What I don't understand is this statement:
After cellphone readers voted her novel No. 1 in one ranking, her story of the tragic love between two childhood friends was turned into a 142-page hardcover book last year. It sold 400,000 copies and became the No. 5 best-selling novel of 2007, according to a closely watched list by Tohan, a major book distributor.
I can't imagine wanting to read something written-- and designed to be read--on a tiny screen in short bursts (and therefore composed of short sentences and chopped paragraphs) in book form. And then there's the weirdness of the fact that the people who write these things aren't readers. If you're like me, you'll find some of the quotations in the Times article astonishing. And, if you're a grammar geek, a word geek in general, you may even find them frightening.
But take heart. Once a generation of cell phone novelists have their hands crippled by writing on the things (or, at the least, bloodied like the woman in the article), maybe cell phones will at least become more ergonomic. And when that happens, perhaps they'll make a cell phone/eReader us regular book-loving folks can tolerate.

5 comments:
I read about this earlier today and thought I had misunderstood due to reading too fast. I guess I didn't.
Like you, I fumble around for at least 15 minutes whenever trying to compose just a simple, short-short text message. A whole book? Forget it, both to writing one this way and to reading the result in any way.
Wow, I think I'm actually appreciating my computer again. Nice machine . . . (pat, pat) . . .
My view of the New York Times after years in the journalism business? I don't know of any other major newspaper which more consistently got stories completely backassward wrong and still retained a shred of credibility. If the NYT told me the sun rose this morning, I would still go out and check. The story sounds like hogwash and even if it did happen, it's probably a silly fad at best.
Sheesh, the Bag Lady doesn't even have text capability on her stone-age cell phone (or if she does, she doesn't know how to do it). She considers it a miracle every time the damned thing actually turns on after repeated jabbing the power button. Can't begin to imagine using it to compose a grocery shopping list, let alone a novel...
Hell, some days she can't even compose a proper comment with a proper keyboard in front of her -that should read 'repeatedLY jabbing the power button'!!
Even the Wall Street Journal carried an article on cell phone 'mobile novels', which prompted my article in Criminal Brief:
http://criminalbrief.com/?p=230
A Japanese author asked to judge these 'novels' was harshly critical of the results, but that hasn't impeded their popularity.
Post a Comment