Sunday, September 2, 2007

Trafficking in Numbers

Four antihistamines, two steroids, three trips to the emergency room and--still--innumerable hives. But that's not actually what I meant.

It used to be that when authors talked about numbers, they meant the number of books they've sold, or the size of their first print run, or how much their advance was.

But, increasingly, what you'll hear is people talking about "website traffic." The old saw about a little knowledge being a dangerous thing applies very well here. Authors are told they should have web presences. They are told that they should use those presences to connect with readers, for marketing and publicity, etc. And that's all true. A website can be a powerful tool.

All too often, however, people (and this isn't just authors, it's anyone who's new to website management) believe that the number of "hits", the amount of traffic, on their site is important. They go out aggressively searching for people to link back and forth with because that way they can move up in the google rankings. But does that really matter? Not so much, as it turns out.

I have an online store. It's a vital part of my business so I have to check out both 1) how people find me and 2) how long they stay on the site. I do check on whether they buy anything, but it's very rare that people find me through google or links from other sites and buy things. Usually, my buyers are people who have met me at a trade show or know me from the several online forums I post to. That being the case, why do I care about the stats at all? Because they help me get a handle on what people are looking for, what I need to produce more of, what they find interesting. They may not buy anything from me online, but many of them will be my trade show customers down the line. (I don't have a blog or forum on my site because I maintain my community contacts in more general settings.)

I know why the numbers are important for my business. But those reasons just aren't valid for authors. Here are the last 5 ways people found us:
1) Linked from Marijke's latest blog post
2) Google search on "4 mystery addicts"
3) Google image search on "toadstool"
4) Google search on "short short fifties teens"
5) Google search on "rich women 1800s"

Does that help me particularly? Nope. Interesting, curious even, but not particularly helpful. We average 35 visitors a day, so for grins I checked the last 35 entries. In addition to the above 5:
16 "unknowns"--people who didn't follow a link, just came directly to us
Another Google.uk image search on "toadstool"
2 Google searches on Meg Ruley
1 Google search on Stephanie Kip Rostan
1 link from my.yahoo.com
3 links from blogger profiles
1 Google search on "what woman wrote the first mystery story"
1 Google search on "why are women late to dates"
1 link from http://seanachi.wordpress.com/
1 Google search on "descriptive passages on anger"
1 link from an email
1 link from The Cozy Chicks
1 self-referential link (they came to the front page via an older blog post)

Marijke, Sean and the Cozy Chicks all have links to us in their sidebars. But as you can see, the vast majority of our visitors come either out of the blue or from Google searches that don't much relate to our content. If I were using this blog as a tool to try to sell books, I might be worried about those numbers. But I don't post here in the hope that someone will buy my book. After all, I don't have a book to sell.

Writers will often buy a book even if it's not to their taste, just because they want to support the book's author. That's not true of the general public, though, so I wouldn't expect a reader of this blog to run out and buy my book just because I seemed like a good person. In fact, chances are better that I might offend someone, thereby causing them not to buy my book. (I try not to offend people, but it does happen.)

A while back, the Smart Bitches had a discussion of what works and what doesn't for promotion. Some promos were deemed more useful than others--canvas totes and nice pens being more useful than bookmarks--but no matter how useful the item was, it would never actually prompt someone to go out and buy a book they would not otherwise have bought. The same, I think, is true of a website.

Why, then bother having a website at all? I can't speak for everyone, but for myself, I like to connect with people. It's the same thing I enjoyed about working retail, the same thing I still enjoy about trade shows, and part of the reason I became a teacher. I got a lovely email yesterday from a woman who read an article I wrote for Art Jewelry Magazine. She had, as it turns out, not found me through the magazine at all, but through one of the online communities to which I belong, where I'd gone over some of the details that got lost in editorial translation for the original article and answered more complicated questions about the process I'd described. If I'd just had a stable website, my storefront, she might never have found me "approachable" enough to email.

I expect that several of the people in the community of beaders, beadmakers and jewelers to which I contribute will buy A Snake in the Glass when--yes, when, not if--it gets published, but that's not why I "hang out" there. If it were, pretty soon people would figure out what I was up to and I'd be cast out on my keister.

So what does all this rambling on mean for authors trying to figure out what their agents, editors, etc, mean when they say "you need a web presence?" It means "think before you act." Before you go out and put up a website, think about what you want from it and what kind of "internet person" you are. Do you enjoy going online? Are you the type to frequently update your own site? Can you commit to posting in a blog once a week--or more often? Do you want to hear from your readers, or would you rather they looked to your site for information rather than communication? Will you be posting excerpts from your books? Will you have contests?

There are an infinite number of ways in which you can use your web presence. Before you create your new "home", consider why you're moving.

9 comments:

Nan Higginson said...

Love your humor - the tally of meds showed that you're not letting this medical stuff get you down. HUZZAH!

I'm endlessly interested on comments about setting up websites that suit individual needs. Your sketch of the options was good news for me.

I'm hoping you'll give more explicit descriptions of information-based websites, and your estimation of their value. (Feels like I'm overbooked already - can't imagine trying to run a website with all the bells and whistles!)

Glad to hear from you. Great info. Think I'll slide in a little blogging on personal branding, which seems somewhat related. (My mentor's running a little workshop on the topic. I'll share the info freely, as she is sharing freely with me!)

Keep us posted on all the complex things that you do, and make look so easy!

Write On!
Nan

alex keto said...

Wandered over from travis erwin's site. interesting thoughts. certainly a blog can be a distraction from real things. Even with a 100 visitors a day, it is hard to see how it makes a difference in the grand scheme of things.

Clare2e said...

Hear, Hear, my unfortunately hive-ridden pal!

Web promotion is like any other kind, and one ought to know what can can be happily and logically provided as well as what tangible results might be realistically achieved. I think lots of people set up vague, unfocused sites without much to offer, don't contribute to other sites or communities, then expect the traffic and dollars to start flowing in some way I can't imagine.

My old blog of weirdness still gets a fair number of hits considering it was always niche-y and I haven't updated it since spring. I covered so many off-the-wall topics in odd combinations and with what I hoped were interesting graphics that I've become highly-ranked on some selectively wacko searches. I get a big % of traffic from just two photos (Suchet as Poirot and a dog's butt wearing sunglasses- no kidding), because the original link sources are gone, but my posts with those images still exist and bring people in. What can I do with those captive eyes? Not much, I think, except be edified and amused, because they don't have enough in common, and they're not really interested in me.

As for this blog: I'm here for the fabulous company, the inspiration and ideas, the chance to spout off, to have help keeping the posts fresh, and to enjoy the many other fine bloggers/commenters we've encountered.

Sure, someday I'll have a book to sell, and then I'll mention it in ALL CAPS!!!!!! But until then, I'm happy just to be here.

Terrie Farley Moran said...

Hey, Laura, it is great to see you here. I hope you are feeling better each day. This is a great post. It makes it easy for we women of mystery to focus on why it is we actually post.

I think that Clare says it beautifully. We are here for the companionship and the ideas. In talking among ourselves and with the people who stop by, we clear our mental cobwebs and learn to think differently, which always helps define our writing.

Terrie Farley Moran said...

Hi Alex,

Thanks for stopping by. I have enjoyed your comments on Travis' blog. I just went over to your site which is truly fascinating. I'll be stopping by again.

See you here, there or at Travis Erwin's place.

And, thanks Travis for the link to this site.

Terrie

Marijke Durning said...

Very interesting post. Food for thought. I always find it interesting to check where people come from when they visit my blog. Some of the strings from google land them at my place but I scratch my head and wonder how on earth my blog came up for that query?? No matter, I can always hope that they like what they see and may come back.

Of course, as you suggest, we have to decide what we want from our blogs. I try to stay away from controversial topics because I am also using my blog to showcase my more casual writing for potential clients. Because I spend my day writing professional stuff, I like to let loose and write as I speak. Although, that's not always a good idea!

I like having regular sites, like this one, to visit, and then I like to go on blog hunts based off comments that others have left on those blogs. It an be an interesting adventure sometimes.

Travis Erwin said...

No problem Terrie. I enjoy the varied commentary over here and I thought some of my readers would as well.

And I find it fascinating, even if it is not all that helpful, the many ways people discover my blog. Some of those google searches are doozies.

Lois Karlin said...

Great post, and it's a grand thing to find you're not cowed by your medical nightmare.

But hey, what's wrong with serendipity? I've bumped into some intriguing sites through a Web search without real intention and yeah, I didn't hang around long, but one or two have ended up among my RSS feeds or bookmarked.

Actually, I think attracting quantity over quality is most important for folks who are after ad revenue with Google AdSense or some such gadget.

As for us? I'm not going for glory. But serendipitous mistakes are part of the Web's weird and glorious nature, and who cares if the folks who find us by accident ever return? We're not an online store.

Two-way links would up our page-ranking and besides, it's a pleasant and friendly kind of thing to exchange. And, too...if we numbered hundreds of hits it might well make an agent or publisher sit up and take notice.

Anyhow, who's moving?

Laura Kramarsky said...

Lois -

I never meant to imply that those serendipitous web searches for things that seem unrelated to us weren't intriguing, or that I haven't run across one or two in my own paths through Google, only that they aren't apt to sell books ;D

And I totally agree that quantity is most important for those who are interested in Google Ads or some such revenue stream. But what troubles me is the number of people who don't understand that simply upping the number of hits on your site probably won't help you sell books.

I think the exchanging of links is a friendly thing to do and once I feel better I fully intend to go back through the link list we created and add a category of links to authors who blog about things other than writing. But I am pretty sure we all understand (given that most of us don't have books to sell!) that we don't do that because it is going to help us sell our books. We do it for the sense of community.

What isn't clear to me is that when agents and editors push authors to create web "homes", either the pushers or the pushees understand the point of the website other than basic name recognition! I'll be very interested in what Nan has to say about personal branding, because I think that will help clarify some of what a site can--and cannot--achieve.